I have to give props to this film for its wild abandon and its vibrant vision of the world. First of all, it's a tantrum of artistic release... second, it's a metaphorical universe, built from scratch, where the substructures (the production, the preparation, the paperwork, the assignments, the transportation) are cunning, but banal -- a superfluous reality, stagnating beneath the fantastic world of the imagination. As a call to arms of spectacle, the movie works great.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhiSi_5o9lFk2hYitPSmLHuSNI-sG0xKBG9DKlWLSV8jBE92NbITpp1Q3btZgWPWB-sPogriTjQneUSZBy91H0T1DyeldViu1iYBD8rQs9-VEKscUElnDWbBtd_wP8tW2ztdbN_/s200/Holy+Motors.jpeg)
Also, I couldn't have asked for a better interlude than the wild musical romp at the center of the film, a sequence reminiscent of Fellini and Gogo Bordello.
The misgivings I had about Holy Motors were actually similar to the ones I had about another 2012 film, the Wachowskis' Cloud Atlas. In short: all those little vignettes, while presenting lovely tributes to the various permutations of cinematic storytelling, had to be reduced to abbreviations and imprints, lo-fi echoes of great ideas. I know this was unavoidable, given the constraints of the feature-film and the mission statements of these omnibus films. Still, seeing (in Holy Motors) an isolated fragment of a Jodorowskiish beauty-and-the-beast, or (in Cloud Atlas) a quick condensation of an hyperkinetic postmodern fable of love and liberation and cloning... it just serves to draw attention to its own incompleteness, to give us a cropped window into a larger, more beautiful film that we'll never get to see.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3WeFQr-MUeP7RvqbgLUzSN8IAxKMxP19g9tfLIySaGemSFnDJIqEaE9NDrC3PxYDWFHid-MkJo7OlzMHLsH8DKz8LRSI4HfRiNAnwvL5kjNBOSoLxOi-iClzOcdieHcxh4f64/s200/cloud-atlas-war.jpeg)
I guess, even in its failure to fully evoke any particular universe, both of these films are successful in communicating the meta-message they seem to be aiming for, at least partially. As much as self-contained fictions, they are essays on the irreducible multiplicity of cinema, on the impossibility of turning a great film into a small part of a big ol' omnibus. Both films are somewhat less than the sum of their parts, I think, but that the failure itself contributes to another message: isn't it beautiful, being in control of this medium that's so rich, we can't even get its stories to fit together on a single canvas? If that's what you guys were saying, Leos Carax and the Wachowskis, then okay, cool. I got it.
No comments:
Post a Comment